Final warning by Pakistan to U.S.Z. and NATO - Supply routes may be suspended

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

• Subscribe to our Daily Updates

Alhamdulillah, Pakistan has reacted very angrily yesterday (Thanks to the establishment and Army) after a NATO air assault killed almost 60 so called "militants" inside Pakistani territory. Pakistan has comprehensively denounced air strikes on its territory by NATO helicopters based in Afghanistan that killed dozens of "suspected militants". The incursions have further complicated Washington's fraught alliance with Islamabad at a time when the Neocon Globalists and their puppet President Barack Obama's administration is pressing Pakistan to "do more" to support the Afghan campaign.

Pakistan has strictly told NATO leaders that it will stop protecting U.S.Z and NATO supply lines to Afghanistan if foreign aircrafts stage further cross-border attacks against "suspected militants", security officials said on Tuesday.

If this threat is made practical, this would have major consequences on the war in Afghanistan as well as on Pakistan’s relationship with the United States of Zionism, which is not as important for Pakistan as it is for U.S.Z. There is a great chance that Islamabad may do so in the near future if these attacks continue.

It was also a clear sign of Pakistani unease at the attacks on Saturday and Monday by NATO aircraft against innocent civilians in the name of militants in its northwest tribal areas and a reminder of the leverage the country has in its complicated alliance with Washington.

While Pakistani puppets have remained largely silent about U.S.Z drone strikes in the northwest, Pakistani security officials say that they are drawing a line at direct interference by U.S.Z and NATO's manned aircraft. They rejected NATO's statements that NATO air defense teams were acting to protect an Afghan border post against "militants who had attacked it, then fled to Pakistan".

The Pakistan Army officers said that Pakistan’s foreign ministry had conveyed the threat to stop protecting NATO convoys to NATO headquarters in Brussels despite the resistance from the Puppets Zardari and Gillani. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to give their names to the media.

If there are any more attacks by U.S.Z or NATO choppers “we will not be able to ensure the safety of their convoys”, one of the officials told an Associated Press reporter at a private briefing.

On Monday, the foreign ministry strongly criticized the attacks and warned of “response options” if they happened again. Some 80% of non-lethal supplies for foreign forces fighting in landlocked Afghanistan, cross over Pakistani soil after being unloaded at docks in Karachi, a port city in the south. Pakistani security forces provide security for the convoys, which are often attacked as they travel north, by pro-Afghanistan groups who want to kick U.S.Z out of Afghanistan.

Although NATO and the United States of Zionism have alternative supply routes, the Pakistani ones are the cheapest and most convenient. In Washington, Defense Department spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said he was unaware of any threats by Islamabad to stop providing convoy security. But “just on the face of it, if they were to stop providing security to our convoys that would be problematic. We would work with the Pakistanis to make sure that wouldn’t happen.” The border incidents are alleged to have happened after insurgents attacked NATO forces in Afghanistan and then retreated back across the unmarked border.

Talat Masood, a security analyst and former Pakistani army general, said even though Pakistan has reduced its criticism of the missile strikes, it had to draw the line somewhere or it risked being seen as more interested in doing America’s bidding than protecting the country’s sovereignty.

“What other means of countering these helicopter attacks does Pakistan have?” said Masood. “They cannot attack the helicopters or the troops YET because that would really break up the relationship.”

According to him, one possible explanation for Pakistan’s reaction was India, its historical and much larger enemy. He said that the Army was sending a signal that it would not accept Indian forces one day using the same justification to launch cross-border attacks on militants sheltering on its eastern border.

The anger over the incursions contrasts with Pakistan’s relative silence over American drone strikes against the so called “al-Qaida and Taliban targets” in the northwest. There have been more attacks this month than in any other month in the past since they started in 2007 during the shameless puppet Musharraf’s time.

Also, one shouldn’t forget that the United States of Zionism and NATO are losing ground control in Afghanistan fast and they are totally uncertain about their future. They want to do maximum damage to their enemy before they finally have to pull out and this is driving the current air raid campaign by the unmanned drones on the Pakistan – Afghanistan border.

• Drone attacks increased - Opportunities fading for the dying Allied and U.S.Z forces

Enticing Fury

Pakistan Cyber Force

U.S.Z threats backfire - Pakistani Establishment and General Kiyani take a firm stand

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

•  Subscribe to our Daily Updates

Ever since Pakistan developed strategic relationship with U.S.Z in the sixties, it has been continuously and periodically receiving threats from the United States of Zionism. On the face of it, the reasons keep on changing but the real aim of these threats always remains the same. Till this time, Pakistan has become quite used to such threats. The Pakistani establishment can easily discern what is a threat and what is a bluff.

Have the threats achieved the results that the United States of Zionism wanted? Absolutely not! The U.S.Z base was closed down despite the threats. Islamabad still continues to pursue its aims in Afghanistan despite the assassination of a Prime Minister. The Globalist Puppet President Carter was forced to deal with President Zia Ul haq. Pakistan continued to pursue the Nuclear Program despite several sanctions and threats to the life of the Prime Minister in whose time the program was initiated. Pervez Musharraf agreed to the seven points in theory that were presented to him as a bypass route to avoid “being bombed to stone age”, but was never allowed to be totally compliant by the real controlling powers in Pakistan that never let the puppets cross a certain limit. General Kiyani sahb, according to Bob Woodward, totally rebuffed the U.S.Z delegation.

General Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani

Frustrated over Pakistan’s lackluster response to the war against terrorism, U.S.Z Puppet President Barack Obama sent his top dogs to threaten Pakistan that he would have no other option but to respond, if they do not take decisive action against “terrorist safe havens”.

Investigative journalist Bob Woodward, in his latest book “Obama’s Wars”, writes:

Adding to the frustration, the Pakistani establishment in particular the all powerful Army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kiyani refused to adhere to any of the four demands that the U.S made through National Security Adviser Gen James Jones and CIA chief Leon Panetta during that trip in May this year.
Kiyani would not budge very much. He had other concerns. "I’ll be the first to admit, I’m India centric”, General Kiyani said.

General James Jones having concerned look on his face

CIA Chief Leon Panetta

“The President wants everyone in Pakistan to understand that if such an attack connected to a Pakistani group is successful, then there are some things even he would not be able to stop. Just like there are political realities in Pakistan, there are realities in the United States of Zionism.

The book further claims that:

“No one will be able to stop the response and consequences. There is not a threat, just a statement of political fact. Zardai was told during the meeting”.

Giving a series of specific instances how "terrorists’ leaders" are operating unhindered inside Pakistan, Jones told the Puppet Zardari that Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba commander of the 2008 Mumbai attacks, is not being adequately interrogated and

“he continues to direct Lashkar-e-Tayyaba operations from his detention center. Lashkar-e-Tayyaba is operating in Afghanistan and there, the group carried out a recent attack at a guesthouse. Intelligence also shows that Lashkar-e-Tayyaba is threatening attacks in the United States and the possibility is rising each day".
General James Jones said according to the book "Obama's Wars".

After meeting their Puppet Zardari, U.S.Z officials met Kiyani sahb, wherein Jones told Pakistan Army Chief that the clock had started ticking ever since all the four requests had been made by the Neocon Globalist Puppet Obama.

Kiyani sahb holding a press conference in the middle of mountains

"But Kiyani would not budge very much. He had other concerns. 'I’ll be the first to admit, I’m India centric ( Pakistan is not threatened by our brothers Afghan Mujahideen at all )' ", Kiyani sahb said, according to the book.

Enticing Fury

Pakistan Cyber Force

U.S.Z to bomb 150 Sites in Pakistan - Pakistan's Strategic Response

Read on Pakistan Cyber Force Facebook Page

•  Subscribe to our Daily Updates

Many years into the so called "War Against Terror", Pakistan has by now become quite used to threats. Pakistan has got the capability by now to differentiate between a THREAT and a bluff. These threats and bluffs started right from the independence of this state when Nehru threatened Pakistan on 14th August, 1947. Some people are of the opinion that Shaheed-e-Millat Liaqat Ali Khan was assassinated due to his working on a plan for a confederation with Afghanistan. Later on, Kruschev (Russia) threatened Islamabad of severe consequences if the United States of Zionism's headquarter near Peshawar was not removed immediately. It was threatened by President Johnson when General Ayyub Khan closed down the U.S.Z base. Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger threatened Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto for pursuing a Nuclear Program. Pervez Musharraf was threatened with being “bombed to the stone age” if the Pakistan Government didn't accept the seven points. Hillary Clinton threatened Pakistan with deadly consequences without clarifying what that threat meant. Now there are revelations (from not very reliable Indian sources) that the United States of Zionism wants to bomb 150 sites in Pakistan. Still they wonder, why there is ANTI-AMERICANISM in Pakistan. They have been spending billions of dollars on their mindless gigantic media drones named GEO, EXPRESS, SAMAA, ARY, INDUS, HUM and more to "help reconstruct good image of the American Nation amongst Pakistanis" but to no avail.

Undoubtedly, the White House will never take responsibility of these threats however the latest "hot pursuit" strikes by NATO this week have given a new meaning to these threats.

“The Obama administration has always been clear that the path to winning the war in Afghanistan goes through Pakistan. But if Bob Woodward’s new book is accurate, the White House considers its war effort much more dependent on the success and survival of Pakistan’s civilian government than was previously known".
Josh Rogin, Foreign Policy Magazine discusses the Obama tilt towards Pakistan.

Bob Woodward’s market jittering book entitled “Obama’s Wars” sheds new light on the Zionist Puppet Obama's administration’s vast outreach to the Pakistani civilian government led by Puppet Asif Ali Zardari. It paints a picture of an administration working hard to court the Pakistanis while remaining somewhat confused about Pakistani thinking on a range of issues.

Obama Wars by Bob WoodWard

One of the more interesting details in the advanced reports of Bob Woodward’s “Obama’s Wars” is that Washington had prepared a “retribution plan” in the event of a major attack on the United States which is traced back to Pakistan.

• “Some locations might be outdated, but there would be no concern, under the plan, for who might be living there now. The retribution plan called for a brutal punishing attack on at least 150 or more associated camps”
• The United States has a secret “retribution” plan to bomb more than 150 terror camps in Pakistan in the event of another major terrorist attack originating from that country.

This shocking disclosure about the "All bets off" policy of the Globalist Cartel sitting in Washington, towards an ostensibly dubious ally in the war on terror is contained in Bob Woodward’s opus ”Obama’s Wars” which details an evolving U.S.Z approach in the region.
The plan pre-dates the new Puppet Obama's presidency, going back to the old Puppet Bush's White House, but elements of policy, aimed at wiping out terrorist sanctuaries in Pakistan, is evident in the current administration’s ruthless bombing by unmanned drones of the so called "terrorist targets" inside Pakistan, which far surpasses the Bush approach in terms of frequency and intensity.

The Bomber Drone on Kabul Airport

The U.S.Z threat also puts in great context, the secretary of state Hillary Clinton's dire warning to Islamabad earlier this year that there would be severe consequences for Pakistan if another 9/11-type attack were traced back to that country.

The Dragon Surveillance Drone is being used to intercept satellite communication phones used by Talibans

According to Woodward:

Then President Bush did not see much difference between 9/11 and 26/11; a foundation of his presidency was zero tolerance for terrorists and their enablers and he was extremely proud of the hard-line doctrine.
Although plans for punitive strikes against Pakistan was initially linked to another 9/11 type attack on U.S, it evidently evolved after the 26/11 Mumbai carnage, when Bush asked his aides for contingency plans for dealing with Pakistan.
He called his national security team into the Oval Office and told his advisers, “You guys get planning and do what you have to do to prevent a war between Pakistan and India.” The order suggests that the U.S would undertake the bombing to prevent India from retaliating against Pakistan leading possibly to an all-out war.
“This is like 9/11, he (Bush) said, The United States military did not have “war” plans for an invasion of Pakistan. Instead, it had and continues to have one of the most sensitive and secret of all military contingencies, what military officials call a “retribution plan” in the event of another 9/11-like attack.”
In fact, such is the anger within the United States administration about Pakistan’s cunning and double-faced approach that the plan calls for a no-holds-barred approach. “Some locations might be outdated, but there would be no concern, under the plan, for who might be living there now. The retribution plan called for a brutal punishing attack on at least 150 or more associated camps”.

So how did Pakistan escape the wrath of U.S.Z’s “zero tolerance” policy? According to Woodward:

CIA intelligence with 48 hours of the attack showed no direct ISI link. Bush himself called Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to tell him that the new Pakistani government was not involved in the attack.
But the CIA later received reliable intelligence that the ISI was directly involved in the training for Mumbai. ISI chief Ahmed Shuja Pasha flew to Washington later to admit that at least two retired Pakistani army officers who planned the Mumbai attack had ISI links “but this had not been an authorized ISI operation. It was rogue.”
“There may have been people associated with my organization who were associated with this,” Pasha argued. “That’s different from authority, direction and control.”
Obama Presidency’s evolving Af-Pak doctrine that is more Pak than Af.

In an ABC interview available on youtube, Woodward described how Obama was told of deep problems in the U.S.Z relationship with Pakistan at his very first intelligence briefing, likening it to a “cold shower” for the President coming just two days after his 2008 presidential victory.
Woodward writes further:

“Imagine the high of being elected on that Tuesday and they come in two days later and say, by the way, here are the secrets, and one of the secrets is Pakistan. We’re attacking with a top-secret, covert operation, the safe havens in Pakistan, but Pakistan is living a lie. And this is a theme throughout the whole Obama presidency: ‘How do you get control of Pakistan?’ “

Not very long after that, in an Oval Office meeting with Pakistan’s Puppet President Asif Ali Zardari, Obama bluntly tells him that his country has to get over its obsession with India. “We do not begrudge you being concerned about India”, Obama tells Zardari, "but we do not want to be part of arming you (Pakistan) against India, so let me be very clear about that.”

From all accounts, Puppet Zardari’s attempt to change Pakistan’s chronic pathology towards India has been thwarted by the country’s military. 
Times of India.

Undoubtedly everyone remembers former Puppet Pervez Musharraf’s comment that Washington had threatened to bomb Pakistan back into the stone age if he did not cooperate after 9/11. But bombing a nuclear-armed country into a state of chaos, or indeed attempting to invade it, are unlikely policy options for the Neocon Zionists as they try to extract themselves from two unpopular wars while also fretting about neighbouring Iran’s own nuclear ambitions. Yet bombing "suspected al Qaeda camps" in the tribal belt could simply increase instability with further increased militancy. So where does that leave the United States of Zionism and its “retribution plan”? Where are the red lines that would demand an immediate and powerful U.S.Z reaction? Would it depend on the size of the attack, the intensity of public reaction, or electoral imperatives at the time? Does anyone know? Does Pakistan?

Josh Rogin describes the U.S.Z policy very differently than what the TOI reports said.

“According to Woodward’s account, the centrality of Pakistan was championed early on by Bruce Riedel, the Brookings scholar who was brought on as a key figure in the Obama administration’s March 2009 Afghanistan strategy review.”
“Obama, however, opted to pursue a less confrontational path. He concluded the central task would be convincing the Pakistani leadership to throw its lot in with the United States He said at the time of the initial strategy review in March 2009, “that we had to have a serious heart-to-heart with Pakistani civilian, military and intelligence leaders.”

Later that year, when making the decision to send an additional 30,000 “surge” troops to Afghanistan, The globalists sitting in Neocon knew that their plans to also expand the U.S.Z military presence in Pakistan and widen drone strikes would be a hard sell to the Pakistan's real decision making powers, keeping aside the Puppet Zardari and the Thief Ministers. In an attempt to sweeten the deal, the Puppet Obama framed the policy as a new “strategic partnership” with Pakistan, even tying the success of the U.S.Z mission in Afghanistan to the survival of the Puppet Zardari and the legacy of his deceased wife Benazir Bhutto.

Obama wrote in a letter to Zardari delivered by National Security Advisor Jim Jones and counter terrorism adviser John Brennan:

“I know that I am speaking to you on a personal level when I say that my commitment to ending the ability of these groups to strike at our families is as much about my family’s security as it is about yours”

Not very long ago, the Puppet Zardari was forced to tell the former U.S.Z Ambassador to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad that he believed the United States of Zionism was involved in orchestrating attacks by the Pakistani Taliban against the Pakistani civilian government.
When Woodward sat down for his interview with Obama earlier this year, he asked the Zionist puppet if the situation was still that Pakistan is the centerpiece of the U.S.Z strategy. “It continues to this day”, Obama replied.
Bombing 150 sites in Pakistan would face colossal retribution towards the U.S.Z. Here are some possible scenarios.

1. Pakistan would immediately terminate the NATO supply routes choking the war in Afghanistan.
2. All overflights of U.S.Z planes and drones would be stopped.
3. The U.S.Z would be evicted from the air bases on Pakistani territory.
4. The Civilian Puppet Government that resists a forceful response to the U.S.Z would not be able to stand.
5. Without a reasonable supply route, the U.S.Z would then have to end the war in Afghanistan.
6. Pakistan would possibly end cooperation in the “War on Terror”.
7. In the worst case scenario, the U.S.Z bases in the vicinity could be targeted (My personal favourite)

Pakistan Army - Enemy's worst nightmare

Enticing Fury

Pakistan Cyber Force