“But in my point of view the report involves some concerns on the implications under international law because the report will become an administrative verdict on the inefficiency and inability of the state institutions. Such finding will have serious damaging consequences from the point of view of international law. It is important to note the USZ and other unilateral interventionists are stating that if a state is either “unable” or “unwilling” to perform counter terrorism measures, then responsibility to enforce counter terrorism measures shifts to international community or to a single state that is likely to be affected. In such an eventuality unilateral armed action will be justifiable. The inquiry report (being conducted here) should not, therefore, lead to an authentic documentation of the inability of Pakistani institutions to carry out counter-terrorism measures and operations”, he said.
When asked about the inquiry (into Abbotabad incident), he said, it would be up to the political leadership to decide. “But in my point of view the report involves some concerns on the implications under international law because the report will become an administrative verdict on the inefficiency and inability of the state institutions. Such finding will have serious damaging consequences from the point of view of international law. It is important to note the USZ and other unilateral interventionists are stating that if a state is either “unable” or “unwilling” to perform counter terrorism measures, then responsibility to enforce counter terrorism measures shifts to international community or to a single state that is likely to be affected.”
Enticing Fury
Pakistan Cyber Force
No comments:
Post a Comment