{EOP}Real Agenda behind Osama Circus

The USZ government’s bin Laden story was so poorly crafted that it did not last 48 hours before being fundamentally altered. Indeed, the new story put out on Tuesday by White House press secretary Jay Carney bears little resemblance to the original Sunday evening story. The fierce firefight did not occur. Osama bin Laden did not hide behind a woman. Indeed, Osama, Carney said, “was not armed”. The firefight story was instantly suspicious as not a single SEAL got a scratch, despite being up against Qaeda, described by former Pentagon chief Rumsfeld as “the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the earth.” Every original story detail has been changed. It wasn’t bin Laden’s wife who was murdered by the SEALs, but the wife of an aide. It wasn’t Laden’s son, Khalid, who was murdered, Hamza. Carney blamed the changed story on “the fog of war”. But there was no firefight, so where did the “fog of war” come from?
The White House has also had to abandon the story that Obama and his national security team watched tensely as events unfolded in real time (despite the White House having released photos of the team watching tensely), with the operation conveyed into the White House by cameras on the SEALs helmets. If Obama was watching the event as it happened, he would have noticed, one would hope, that there was no firefight and, thus, would not have told the public that bin Laden was killed in a firefight. Another reason the story had to be abandoned is that if the event was captured on video, every news service in the world would be asking for the video, but if the event was orchestrated theater, there would be no video. No explanation has been provided for why an unarmed bin Laden, in the absence of a firefight, was murdered by the SEALs with a shot to the head. For those who believe the government’s story that “we got bin Laden”, the operation can only appear as the most botched operation in history. What kind of incompetence does it require to senselessly and needlessly kill the most valuable intelligence asset on the planet?

According to the USZ govt, the terrorist movements of the world operated through bin Laden, “the mastermind.” Thanks to a trigger-happy stupid SEAL, a bullet destroyed the most valuable terrorist information on the planet. Perhaps the SEAL was thinking that he could put a notch on his gun and brag for the rest of his life about being the macho tough guy who killed Osama. When such a foundational story as the demise of bin Laden cannot last 48 hours without acknowledged “discrepancies” that require fundamental alternations to the story, there are grounds for suspicion in addition to the suspicions arising from the absence of a dead body, from the absence of any evidence that bin Laden was killed in the raid or that a raid even took place. The entire episode could just be another event like the Aug 4, 1964, Gulf of Tonkin event that never happened but succeeded in launching open warfare against Vietnam at a huge cost to Americans and enormous profits to the military/security complex. There is no doubt that the USZ is sufficiently incompetent to have needlessly killed bin Laden instead of capturing him. But who can believe that the USZ would quickly dispose of the evidence that bin Laden had been terminated? The govt’s story is not believable that the govt dumped the proof of its success into the ocean, but has some photos that might be released, someday. As one reader put it in an email to me: “What is really alarming is the increasingly arrogant sloppiness of these lies, as though the govt has become so profoundly confident of their ability to deceive people that they make virtually no effort to even appear credible.”

Govts have known from the beginning of time that they can always deceive citizens and subjects by playing the patriot card. “Remember the Maine”, the “Gulf of Tonkin”, “weapons of mass destruction”, “the Reichstag fire” - the staged events and bogus evidence are endless. If Americans knew any history, they would not be so gullible. The real question before us is: What agenda is the “death of bin Laden” designed to further? There are many answers to this question. Many have noticed that Obama was facing re-election with poor approval ratings. Is anyone surprised that the NY T/CBS Poll finds a strong rise in Obama’s poll numbers after the raid? As the NYT reported, “the glow of national pride” rose “above partisan politics, as support for the president rose significantly among both Republicans and independents. In all, 57% said they now approved of the president’s job performance, up from 46%.”

Another possibility is that Obama realized that the budget deficit and the dollar’s rescue from collapse require the end of the expensive Afghan war and occupation and spillover war into Pakistan. As the purpose of the war was to get bin Laden, success in this objective allows the USZ to withdraw without loss of face, thus making it possible to reduce the USZ budget deficit by several hundred billion dollars annually-an easy way to have a major spending cut. If this is the agenda, then more power to it. However, if this was Obama’s agenda, the military/security complex has quickly moved against it. CIA director opened the door to false flag attacks to keep the war going by declaring that Qaeda would avenge bin Laden’s killing. Hillary declared that success in killing bin Laden justified more war and more success.

Added by PCF: ( The real agenda is not to withdraw from Afghanistan but to keep the reason for withdrawal ready just in case if the withdrawal is inevitable later on. The main aim of USZ in the region is to extend the war to Pakistan in order to weaken the country and somehow snatch its nuclear assets for which their media has already started laying the propaganda pretext by declaring ISI as a "terrorist" organization. )

Homeland Security declared that the killing would motivate “homegrown violent extremists” into making terrorist attacks. “Homegrown violent extremists” is an undefined term, but this newly created bogyman seems to include environmentalists and war protesters. Like “suspect”, the term will include anyone the govt wants to pick up. Various parts of the govt quickly seized on the success in killing bin Laden to defend and advance their own agendas, such as torture. Americans were told that bin Laden was found as a result of information gleaned from torturing detainees held in Eastern European CIA secret prisons years ago. This listing of possible agendas and add-on agendas is far from complete, but for those capable of scepticism and independent thought, it can serve as a starting point. The agendas behind the theatre will reveal themselves as time goes on. All you have to do is to pay attention and to realize that most of what you hear from the mainstream media is designed to advance the agendas.

Written by Paul Craig Roberts who was Assistant Secretary of the USZ Treasury during Zionist Puppet President Reagan’s first term. He was also the Associate Editor of the Zionist WSJ.

Enticing Fury
Pakistan Cyber Force