Sunday 24 April 2011

{EOP}Quran-burning pastor briefly jailed in Michigan

The USZ Zionist pawn, the pastor whose burning of a Quran sparked deadly violence in Afghanistan was briefly jailed in a heavily Islamic suburb Friday after a court banned his protest outside a mosque. A local judge jailed pastor Terry Jones of Gainesville, Florida and his associate Wayne Sapp after a court found their planned protest outside the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Michigan, could lead to violence. During his court appearance, the illiterate savage pastor Jones, absolutely opposing his own book, the Bible, which has prophecized about Qur'an and Holy Prophet Muhammad s.a.w, argued that the Quran “promotes terrorist activities around the world.” He also insisted that his right to protest against Islam was protected by the First Amendment to the USZ Constitution. “The First Amendment does us no good if it confines us to saying what is popular”, the Zionist pawn pointed out. But Dearborn Police Chief Ronald Haddad testified that his department had received information about serious threats made against Jones from local residents, arguing that his protest could lead to violence if allowed.

The cursed savage pastor Terry Jones
Prosecutor Robert Moran argued that the protest had nothing to do with the First Amendment and at stake were security and peace in the community. In the end, the jury sided with the prosecution and Judge Mark Somers set bond at the symbolic amount of $1 each for the two pastors, which they initially refused to pay. Following their refusal, both were escorted to a local jail. But local media reported both men changed their minds after spending about an hour behind bars and posted the $1 bond. Jones and Sapp made international headlines after their ceremonial “trial and execution” of the Quran by burning led to deadly protests in Afghanistan. Last month’s Quran burning unleashed protests across Afghanistan, some of which were violent. Seven American terrorist invaders in Afghanistan working in disguise under the cover of "UN staff" were killed during one protest in the northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif on April 1. Overall, more than 20 people have been killed. We at PCF believe that the purpose of this horrific event freely carried out by this Zionist pawn was to facilitate emotional uprising of Muslims in the Middle East so that they can be taken advantage of by the subversion experts of CIA for sparking the so called "revolutions" which give rise to completely headless Muslim states in the Middle East at the end. These subversion experts are continuing their charade throughout the world under various sweet sounding filthy disguises e.g., "social workers", "humanitarian workers", "International Red Cross(The Zionist Crisis Cashing Machine)", "free press journalists" and "UN workers" etc.

Enticing Fury
Pakistan Cyber Force

3 comments:

Mohamed Ameen said...

Crazy and mad people around the world do behave like lunatics and try to be violent in attacking and killing the innocent out of anger and blind and uncontrolled emotional attachments.
But at the same time it is wrong on the part of some of the less knowledgeable people sacrificing their lives in protests and uprisings. Peaceful demonstrations are okay as a form of protest.

It is equally wrong on the part of Western Govts., to allow all sorts of gimmicks, nonsenses, mockery, insults, vilification to continue, on the pretext of freedom of speech. As a matter of fact there is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech.

Absolute freedom of speech can not and should not exist in any pluralistic, multi-cultured society if we wish to maintain mutual and peaceful co-existence between minority and majority communities. If Govts in the West want they can control this sort of nonsense such as burning the holy scriptures of religions, based laws on race-relations, public nuisance, incitement to violence or bring in new laws to restrict such lunacy. Right now laws may not exist in USA to do this. But law makers should seriously consider how to cope with extraordinary situations like this. May be we have to amend laws in such a way to reduce a bit of freedom and more of the safety and security of Americans. We can not blindly and stubbornly stick to clauses of law without bothering about the lives of innocent people who might be killed in large numbers in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, etc by emotion packed people. The priority is safety and security of people.

Iran and other Muslim nations have to use other means to make the west read the strong message on the walls, one way is to have trade sanctions and calling back their ambassadors for consultations

Mohamed Ameen said...

A number of critics tamper with the beliefs of sincere Muslim believers and cast doubts on their beliefs and try to show such beliefs to be fraudulent and non-divine. There is blind gloating, uncritical patriotism, extreme xenophobic nationalism and downright rather unpleasant chauvinism.

May not all agree, but many faith based persons individuals like me feel that we need some strong moral foundation to stand on, even if it is meant outside the statute books. Some critics overtly or covertly want to accomplice a materialistic empire that is attached to the imperialism of yesteryear by forcing people to declare themselves to be Westerners or Easterners forgetting the unity of humanity.

They are under the impression that ethnic minorities in the U.S. can not represent themselves nevertheless, out of political necessity the minorities can be represented only by the majority race.

The opposition between Orient and Occident, Christians and Muslims or even secular and religious, is both misleading and highly undesirable in the fast changing globalising world that moves towards multiculturalism rather than the xenophobic and aggressive cultural nationalism.

Cultures are hybrid and heterogeneous and cultures and civilizations are closely interrelated and interdependent to beggar unitray description of their individuality

A handful of western values and ideas none of which have any meaning outside the history of conquest,immigration,travel and the mingling of peoples that gave the U.S. its present mixed identity.

Mohamed Ameen said...

The Crazy Act of the Qur’an Burning in America

Afghans protesting the burning of a copy of the Quran at a small Florida church stormed a U.N. compound in northern Afghanistan a few weeks ago and killed at least seven international staff. At least four protesters were also killed.

About 30 people attended a mock trial staged by the church (Dove World Outreach Center) on March 20 as part of the "International Judge the Quran Day." The church's website stated that after the five-hour process, the Quran "was found guilty and a copy was burned inside the building.
A picture on the website shows a book in flames in a small portable fire pit. The church on Friday confirmed that the Quran had been burned

Burning the sacred Quran was certainly a sacrilegious act done by a group of lunatics and the what the Afghan Muslim insurgents did out of religious fanaticism and anger is equally condemnable.


It is equally wrong on the part of Western Governments ( in this case the US Administration) to keep repeating the mantra that the church has its democratic constitutional freedom to do the outrageous act though it is un-American act. The same constitution has failed to protect the profound and deep rooted religious sentiments of American Muslim minorities.

Does the law allow all sorts of gimmicks, nonsense, mockery, insults, vilification of Islamic culture to continue, on the pretext of freedom of speech. As a matter of fact there is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech.

Absolute freedom of speech can not and should not exist in any pluralistic, multi-cultured society if we wish to maintain mutual and peaceful co-existence between minority and majority communities. If Govts in the West sincerely want they can control this sort of nonsense such as burning the holy scriptures of religions, based on race-relations act, public nuisance act, incitement to violence act or bring in new laws to restrict such lunacy.

Right now laws may not exist in USA ( but they do in UK)to do this. But law makers should seriously consider how to cope with extraordinary situations like this. May be they have to amend laws in such a way to reduce a bit of freedom and more of the safety and security of innocent people who may be victimised (Americans and others).

We can not blindly and stubbornly stick to clauses of law without bothering about the lives of innocent people who might be killed in large numbers in places like Afghanistan, Iraq and other places by emotion packed people. The priority is safety and security of people not blind adherence to the so called freedom of speech.


To give you one solid example, Salman Rushdie’s deliberate hate ( criticsim based on concoction, lies and fabrication) led to violence, killings and bloodshed in the Indian subcontinent. Same thing about the Jyllande Postens Muhammad cartoons. Stop first hurting the religious sensibilities of people. Respect each others cultures

There is so much of false pride, hatred and ill-will towards Islam in the West. People like the Florida Pastor think that they are the centre of the universe and it impels them to remain smugly satisfied with their own empirically-acquired knowledge, as the Quran says, Quote “THEY ARROGANTLY EXULT IN WHATEVER KNOWLEDGE THEY ALREADY POSSESS AND THEY ARE OVERWHELMED BY THE VERY THING WHICH THEY WONT TO DERIDE” Sura 40: Verse

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...